Wrong order of citations

Dear Jana,

thank you very much for your response. I really just used "Springer Basic Number" and inserted all images as graphics or in tables.

Do you have any other idear why it doesn't order in the right way?

Best regards,

Pia

Dear Pia,

Kindly send me your Word document.

To transfer the file, please use our secure upload service

http://www.citavi.com/transfer

So that we can match the files to the issue, please include the ticket ID #88629

Thank you!

Jana

Dear Jana,

I solved the fist problem after thinking a bit longer about your hints. I used the citation funktion also in some comments for my self, which the programm detected as part of my text, and therefore the order was not right.

Now I have a new question:

How can I change the citation style so that it exactly fits to my presets of the university of cologne? Right now I used Springer Basic (numbers) which is quite close to what I need, but in some places is a point missing or page numbers. I attatched a picture of my guidelines. The order of examples is: magazine contribution, book, contribution of a book, Internet-citation.

It would be great if you could also help me with this.

Best regards,

Pia

Sorry, I forgot something:

maybe the citation style: 'Ethik in der Medizin' is even closer, because we need to write all autores and are not allowed to use et al. . Also we don't need to mention the doi:... number, which is right now written behind every point in the list of references.

Best regards,

Pia

Dear Pia,

I am glad that you could find the cause of the problem.

Thanks for your guidelines. The citation style "Der Merkurstab" also inserts page numbers in the reference numbers.

If you wish to modify the style, please follow our suggestions in this article.

Kind regards

Jana